Case Study Based Analysis

Major issues with any hydro operations are with case study solution decreased sediment supply to case study solution downstream environment and case study solution erosive capabilities of continual larger than natural baseflows for baseload operations. With peaking operations, case study solution gigantic flow discharge styles affecting case study solution channel form are case study answer rate and frequency of water level rise, case study solution time case study answer station is at its greatest discharge level, and case study solution rate and frequency of water level drop. A rapid increase in water level has plentiful bank scouring capabilities. The amount of time case study answer power station discharges at its full means influences case study solution degree of saturation of case study answer river banks, which in turn influences case study solution degree of seepage brought about erosion that can occur when case study answer power station turns off. Frequent and rapid drawdowns in water level bring about considerable pore water pressures as case study solution water drains out of case study answer banks, so with peaking operations case study solution frequency of seepageinduced erosion events raises, even though case study solution severity of any one event may be under differently if case study solution power station has not been on long because case study solution banks aren’t as saturated. Downstream results on riparian plants with any hydro operations can be a loss of species cover and variety in case study solution riparian zone due to waterlogging and inundation, lack of regeneration and recruitment, and habitat alteration due to bank erosion.